No, it's afternoon!

The film in brief

Living situation 1: Anne lives independently

Anne (50) walks to the front door of her apartment and enters. She moves into the kitchen, where she stands by the coffee machine and carefully inserts two pods. She places two cups underneath, presses the button, and watches the coffee pour. As she does so, she answers a question from her brother, Leendert (off-screen): “What does your day at the sheltered workshop look like?”You see and hear Anne describing her workday in a systematic, precise manner, using multiple ways of expressing time—for example, both “a quarter to ten” and “11:45.”

Living situation 2: Anne, clearly older and with dementia, lives in a group

Anne (60) and Leendert are arguing in the open kitchen while Leendert cooks. Anne insists it cannot be dinner because, in her view, it is still afternoon. She “proves” this by pointing to her watch, which reads 7:10. “That’s afternoon,” she repeats angrily. Leendert tries to convince her that it is not afternoon but evening, offering various forms of “evidence.” Anne, however, continues to point at her watch and insists that it is afternoon. Only when Leendert gives in and concludes that they are going to have lunch does Anne become satisfied.

All footage is authentic and taken from real-life situations.

Theme

The theme of this teaching material is the confusion of time.

Dementia affects a person’s sense of time, a symptom often referred to as confusion of time. People with dementia may also experience confusion in other areas, such as orientation to place and to people. Disorientation in place and person is addressed in other cases. . voor meer informatie. Ook op andere terreinen, zoals plaats en persoon, raken mensen met dementie ‘de weg kwijt’. In andere casussen komen desoriëntatie in plaats en persoon aan de orde.

The case “I am Anne” explores Anne’s life story and the onset of her dementia, including early signs such as getting lost. It also provides important context for the other cases; therefore, it is recommended to watch I am Anne again. 

 

General questions

  1. What do you see, and what stands out to you?
  2. What might be the underlying problem?
  3. What is Leendert's reaction? What is his perception?
  4. What do you notice about the physical environment?
  5. How can you help Anne?

Share this case with others

In-depth questions

  1. What do you find challenging about the shift from correcting to adapting, as demonstrated by Leendert?
  2. If this situation were to happen to you, how would it affect you? Would you be able to adapt in order to help the resident feel comfortable and safe?
  3. How would you explain your decision to adapt to the lived experience of a person with dementia?
  4. How might adapting to a person with dementia affect other group members, and how could you explain this approach to them?
  5. Do you have similar experiences? Can you describe situations in which it was appropriate to adapt, even though you knew it was not the literal truth?

There are different ways to respond to the “alternative truth” experienced by a person with dementia. One approach is to teach and reinforce the factual reality, attempting to convince the person of the “real” truth. This approach is known as reality orientation. Another approach is to set aside the factual reality. In this case, you either go along with the person’s experience or do not challenge it. This is known as validation.

What works and what does not varies from person to person and from moment to moment; outcomes are often unpredictable.As a professional or informal caregiver, you are the one who must find the most appropriate response. Along the way, you will repeatedly encounter questions—often with ethical implications.

Would you like to learn more about reality orientation and validation? 'The caregiver’s companion to intellectual disabilities and dementia: 100 real-life questions and answers' will be released soon. For now, it is available in Dutch.

Statements for Discussion

  1. Reality orientation provokes arguments and confrontation, causing anger or distress in a person with dementia.
  2. You must always tell a disoriented person with dementia the factual truth.
  3. There is no single correct response; handling disorientation always raises uncertainty or ethical concerns.
  4. Family members and informal caregivers are more emotionally affected by these situations than professionals.
  5. Correcting a person with dementia and insisting on factual truth is always in their best interest.